Two recent Moneta Markets complaints allege that money became difficult to recover after trading. The reviews, posted three days apart in August 2026, describe a rejected Binance Pay withdrawal and profit allegedly removed from a separate account. Moneta Markets held a 4.1 out of 5 Trustpilot rating across 575 reviews in the supplied research. Neither allegation has been independently adjudicated.
Reviewer Describes Rejected Withdrawal and Repeated Referral
Nabil Faddouli wrote on 11 August that a $50 deposit had generated $51 in profit before a Binance Pay withdrawal request was rejected without an explanation. The reviewer said emails went unanswered and live chat repeatedly instructed the customer to contact a trading manager by email.
According to the review, follow-up messages continued for more than a week without a practical resolution and the account was effectively blocked. The amount is small, but the operational question is not: why was the request rejected, what document or rule applied, and which team owned the escalation?
Separate Reviewer Alleges Profit Was Removed
A second reviewer wrote on 14 August that profit had been removed from an account and warned others not to deposit. The review supplied fewer details, so no conclusion can be drawn about the amount, trading activity or contractual basis of the adjustment. Moneta Markets had not published a detailed response to either complaint in the supplied research.
Balance adjustments can result from pricing corrections, prohibited strategies, chargebacks or compliance reviews. A fair process requires the broker to identify the rule, preserve the original statement and provide the calculation used. Without those records, readers are left with an allegation rather than evidence sufficient to decide the dispute.
Which Moneta Markets Entity Holds the Account Matters
Moneta Markets operates through several legal entities. The supplied material lists Moneta Markets Capital Ltd under UK Financial Conduct Authority FRN 613381 and Moneta Markets South Africa under Financial Sector Conduct Authority licence 47490. It also lists group companies in Mauritius, the United Arab Emirates and Saint Lucia.
Traders should not assume a licence shown on a global marketing page applies to every account. The client agreement should identify the contracting company, complaint procedure and regulator. Saint Lucia company registration is not equivalent to a financial-services licence. Customers facing a stalled withdrawal should preserve transaction IDs, chat records and account statements, then escalate through the entity-specific process.
BestForex.io View
A modest withdrawal should be the easiest service test a broker can pass. Repeatedly directing a customer from chat to an unanswered email address is a process failure even before anyone decides the underlying balance dispute. Moneta Markets has regulated companies in its structure, but the useful question is narrower: which entity held this account, and can that entity give a dated, evidence-based reason for rejecting the request?
About Moneta Markets
Business: Forex and CFD broker
Group entities: Five listed in supplied research
Named regulators: FCA, FSCA, Mauritius FSC and UAE CMA
Additional entity: Saint Lucia IBC
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Moneta Markets regulated?
Parts of the group are. The supplied research lists entities authorised by the UK FCA and South African FSCA, plus companies in Mauritius and the UAE. Customers should check the entity in their own agreement.
What do recent Moneta Markets complaints allege?
One reviewer alleged a Binance Pay withdrawal was rejected without explanation and support kept redirecting the case. Another alleged profit was removed from an account.
Has Moneta Markets answered these complaints?
No detailed public response to the two reviews was included in the supplied research.
Compare Moneta Markets with Other Brokers
Read our Moneta Markets profile and compare its terms with the Best Forex Brokers in 2026 directory.