Recent Amega complaints include a serious but unproven allegation that all money was withdrawn from a MetaTrader 5 account without the trader. Amega’s Trustpilot page showed a 3.0 out-of-five rating across 282 reviews in the supplied research. A reviewer identified only as Customer wrote on 22 December 2025 that they logged in to find the MT5 account empty and could not see who had withdrawn the money. The claim has not been independently adjudicated.
The MT5 Funds Complaint
The December review alleged that the money had been visible in the trading account before being removed. The supplied evidence did not include a public resolution, transaction record or finding identifying who initiated the transfer. The allegation is therefore unresolved. Amega should be able to provide the client with a timestamped account ledger, wallet history, destination identifier and the contractual basis for any adjustment.
Several explanations can exist when a platform balance changes, including an internal transfer, correction, chargeback, trading adjustment, account compromise or withdrawal. A screenshot alone cannot determine which occurred. The broker should be able to provide a timestamped account ledger, wallet history, destination identifier and the contractual basis for any adjustment. The customer should preserve MT5 statements, emails and security logs.
A Mixed 3.0 Rating
The overall score reflects sharply divided experiences rather than a uniform verdict. On 14 February 2025, Nkanyiso Lushaba alleged that credentials sent for a real account did not work and were not replaced. StranSpeed wrote on 7 September 2024 that Amega transferred MT5 funds into the internal wallet without authorisation and alleged a subsequent 20% deduction. Positive reviewers in 2025 and 2026 praised easy deposits, low spreads, fast execution and prompt withdrawals. All are user-generated accounts, not regulator findings.
A single recent complaint does not prove that Amega systematically removes customer funds. It does justify asking how transfers between the client portal and MT5 are recorded, whether withdrawal confirmation requires two-factor authentication and how disputed adjustments are escalated.
Entity and Account Checks
Amega operates internationally through amega.finance, which links to Trustpilot. Its former amegaglobal.com domain is now listed for sale. The company says it is regulated by the Financial Services Commission of Mauritius. Prospective clients should match the legal company and licence named in their agreement against the FSC’s own register rather than assuming that a brand-level statement applies everywhere.
Readers can inspect the Amega broker profile and compare other firms in the BestForex.io directory. Before depositing, enable every available security control, use a unique password and confirm how the broker documents internal transfers and withdrawals.
BestForex.io View
The allegation that an MT5 balance was withdrawn without the trader deserves a documented answer, but one unresolved review is not proof of misconduct. Amega should provide a complete ledger and resolution; traders should judge the case by those records rather than the accusation alone.
About Amega
Online forex and CFD broker
3.0/5 across 282 Trustpilot reviews
MetaTrader 5
Approximately $2,222, according to one reviewer
Amega Review FAQs
Did Amega withdraw a customer’s MT5 funds?
One reviewer alleged that it did. Amega asked for account details to investigate, and no independently verified outcome was available in the supplied record.
Is a 3.0 Trustpilot rating proof that Amega is unsafe?
No. Trustpilot scores summarize user feedback, not regulatory compliance or audited solvency, and should be considered with entity, licence and withdrawal checks.
What evidence should an affected trader request?
Request the full account ledger, transfer or withdrawal identifier, timestamps, destination details and the contractual reason for any broker adjustment.