OpinionnewsSeptember 8, 20263 min read

Long Asia Faces False-Regulation Allegation and Withdrawal Complaints

Long Asia operates without a verified forex license as traders allege a false MAS claim, trapped balances and withdrawals requiring legal intervention.

ByBeatrix FairmontConsumer Affairs CriticSource: Trader complaint and licensing records
Long Asia faces a false regulation claim allegation — BestForex.io Broker Watch
Long Asia faces a false regulation claim allegation — BestForex.io Broker Watch

Long Asia, a forex broker associated with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, had no valid forex license identified in the records supplied to BestForex.io. One trader further alleged that the firm invoked regulation by Singapore's Monetary Authority while deposits were routed through an Indonesian entity from which it had divested. That allegation has not been confirmed by MAS or a court.

Traders Allege Five-Figure Balances Were Trapped

Akash Patel alleged that withdrawals initially worked before more than $18,000 became inaccessible. Another complaint cited in the supplied material describes $42,000 withheld for four months after an original $21,000 deposit appeared to double on the platform.

A Swedish trader alleged a $41,730 loss and said the money was recovered only after legal intervention. The recovery claim and underlying dispute have not been independently verified. They nonetheless illustrate why a clear legal entity and regulator matter before funds are transferred.

Automated Trading and Platform Complaints

An India-based reviewer alleged that Long Asia's automated system opened 20 to 25 positions at leverage of 1:500 and recorded 1,029 losing trades simultaneously. Other users in Malaysia alleged pending withdrawals attributed to payment-gateway failures.

The supplied review also notes positive reports about low minimum deposits and some smoother withdrawals. Balanced due diligence must acknowledge those experiences, but they do not resolve the licensing question or explain the higher-value disputes. Long Asia's owner has separately acknowledged platform glitches involving execution and balance discrepancies after a version 2.0 launch, according to the source material.

BestForex.io View

License clarity comes before performance claims

Customers cannot assess recourse if they do not know which legal entity holds their deposit or which regulator, if any, supervises it. Allegations involving $18,000, $41,730 and $42,000 make that ambiguity unacceptable. Verify the entity and license before considering spreads, leverage or automated strategies.

About Long Asia

Business type

Offshore forex broker

Associated jurisdiction

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Verified forex license

None identified in supplied records

Primary issue

Withdrawal and entity-routing complaints

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Long Asia regulated?

No valid forex license was identified in the records reviewed for this article.

What is the largest sum alleged to have been withheld?

One case alleges that a $42,000 platform balance remained withheld for four months. The claim is a customer allegation, not a regulatory finding.

Did Long Asia falsely claim MAS regulation?

One trader alleged that it did. BestForex.io has not found a public regulatory or judicial finding that establishes the allegation.

Compare entities with independently verified licenses in the Best Forex Brokers in 2026 directory.

Share this article

Long Asia Review: MAS Claim and Withdrawal Complaints | BestForex.io